Autonomous Vehicles · Data

First it was the enthusiasts. Now it's your neighbor.

Robotaxi ridership has grown tenfold in two years. Mapping that growth onto the classic diffusion of innovations curve shows exactly who is riding now, who's next, and why the playbook that won the first million riders won't win the next ten million.

In May 2024, Waymo was giving about 50,000 paid rides a week. By early 2026 it passed 500,000 weekly rides, with more than ten U.S. markets live and a stated target of a million rides per week by the end of the year.

A tenfold jump in two years! But the change that's more interesting than how many people are riding… is who.

Diffusion of innovations research has shown for decades that new technologies don't spread through a population evenly. They move through distinct segments, in a reliable order: innovators first (about 2.5% of the population), then early adopters (the next 13.5%), then the early majority (34%), the late majority (34%), and finally the skeptics who adopt last, if at all. Each group has a different personality, different information sources, and different reasons to say yes. That's why it's best to not think of adoption as one persuasion problem where you try to persuade "people" (a monolith) to adopt. Instead, it's a relay race where the baton changes hands between segments as behavior diffuses through the population.

Where AV adoption sits on the diffusion curve, mid-2026 Innovators 2.5% Early adopters 13.5% Early majority 34% Late majority 34% Laggards 16% Stated willingness: 21% would ride today Actual adoption: 5% have ridden (Pew, 2026) Waymo's operating markets: majority support, routine use SEGMENTS: ROGERS (2003) · MARKERS: THE XANDY POLL 2025 + PUBLIC POLLING 2026
Figure 1. Adoption segments from Rogers' diffusion of innovations. Nationally, actual adoption (burgundy: 5% of U.S. adults have ridden a driverless car, per Pew Research Center, February 2026) trails stated willingness (mustard: 21% say they would ride today, per The XandY Poll). In Waymo's operating markets, adoption and support have moved well ahead of the national picture.

The first riders looked exactly like the textbook said they would

Our 2025 national polling found the early AV persona was exactly the stereotype you'd expect: younger, more educated, more male, more urban, already comfortable with adjacent technology. Support for local robotaxi service and belief in AV safety moved together across every demographic group we measured, and the groups highest on both—men, adults 25 to 34, college graduates—are a census-perfect portrait of the classic innovator and early adopter. External data also show that early adoption of other tech is related, as electric vehicle owners report far more comfort with AVs than the general public.

Nationally, that's still roughly where things stand. In our 2025 poll, 21% of American adults said they'd be willing to ride a fully autonomous vehicle regularly today, and another 15% put themselves within three years. More than a third said never.

"When would you be willing to regularly ride in a fully autonomous vehicle?" 21 15 18 6 4 36 Willing now 1–3 yrs 4–10 yrs 11–20+ Never 0255075100 % of U.S. adults THE XANDY POLL · APRIL 2025 · U.S. ADULTS (18+) N = 1,467
Figure 2. Distance from adoption, April 2025. About one in five Americans were ready immediately — a near-perfect match for the innovator-plus-early-adopter share of the population — while 36% said never.
Bubble chart of demographic groups plotted by support for local AV taxis and belief that AVs are safer than human drivers
Figure 3. Demographic groups plotted by support for local AV taxis (horizontal) and belief that AVs are safer than human drivers (vertical); bubble size reflects each group's share of the U.S. adult population. Age, education, and especially gender separate the early adopters from everyone else. The XandY Poll, April 2025, N = 1,467.

In the operating markets, the persona has already changed

But things are changing fast, and that change is fairly recent. Here in 2025 in the cities where robotaxis actually operate, the rider base has visibly outgrown the pure innovator-enthusiast segment. San Francisco is the clearest case. Support for driverless robotaxis there rose from 44% in 2023 to 67% in mid-2025, with net favorability swinging from minus 7 to plus 38.

National consumer data shows the same exposure effect: 52% of people living inside Waymo service areas say robotaxis should be legal, compared to only 34% outside them. And the qualitative signal corroborates this—in operating markets like SF and LA the robotaxi is no longer a novelty to photograph but a familiar background detail that blends into the trafficscape. That's not how we'd describe something still in the "Innovator" stage. In those cities, we're very clearly now into adoption by the early majority: pragmatists who adopt once something is proven, normal, and useful.

The national picture, then, is really two curves running at different speeds. Where AVs operate, adoption is pushing into early-majority territory. Where they don't, opinion looks almost exactly like our 2025 data: half of Americans didn't even know AV taxis were already running in U.S. cities, and awareness was one of the strongest correlates of support in our entire survey.

Waymo weekly paid rides: the curve behind the curve 0250k500k750k 50k 175k 450k 500k 1M target May '24 Jan '25 Dec '25 Jul '26 EOY '26 SOURCE: WAYMO ANNOUNCEMENTS & PRESS REPORTS, 2024–2026 · DASHED = COMPANY TARGET
Figure 4. Weekly paid robotaxi rides grew roughly tenfold from May 2024 to mid-2026, spanning more than ten U.S. markets, with a company target of one million weekly rides by the end of 2026.

Why this changes the playbook

The early majority does not buy what innovators buy. While innovators adopt because something is new, the pragmatists adopt because it's proven. The early majority respond to visible evidence, trusted institutions, and social norms (seeing people like themselves ride, hearing from messengers they already trust). Our own polling shows traditional automakers hold the most public trust to develop safe AVs (48%), while the rideshare brands most visible in actual deployments rank near the bottom (31%).

No developer has earned majority trust yet "How much would you trust each of the following entities to develop safe autonomous vehicles?" distrust trust Traditional automakers 48% 23% Large tech companies 36% 33% Shipping & transportation 35% 34% Rideshare companies 31% 39% Startups 27% 35% THE XANDY POLL · APRIL 2025 · U.S. ADULTS (18+) N = 1,467 · REMAINDER = UNSURE
Figure 5. Trust versus distrust in each entity type to develop safe autonomous vehicles. Traditional automakers lead with 48% trust; the rideshare companies most visible in actual deployments rank second-to-last, and startups last. Roughly three in ten Americans are unsure about every category — a public still forming its opinions.

The next few years of AV adoption will be decided by whether the industry can make that handoff—from selling novelty to the few, to proving normalcy to the many. The riders have already started to change. The message needs to change with them.

Sources & notes. XandY Poll national survey, April 2025, U.S. adults (18+), N = 1,467, quota-sampled and census-weighted, MoE ±3 points — read the full report. Rogers, E. M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Waymo ridership and expansion: TechCrunch, Waymo. San Francisco trend: The San Francisco Standard. In-market vs. out-of-market gap: EV Intelligence via InsideEVs. Share of Americans who have ridden a driverless car: Pew Research Center, February 2026.